Posts Tagged ‘media crisis’

“Too Fat To Fly”: How An Emotionally Charged Story Impacted Both Brands

Thursday, February 18th, 2010

If you have no idea what has been going on between Southwest Airlines and actor / director Kevin Smith, you have probably been living under a rock. The purpose of this post is not to give a recap of what happened. You can find that by going to CNN.com, ABC.com, Kevin’s Twitter account and Southwest’s Twitter account and blog. The purpose of this post is not to take sides, or ruminate about what this incident means for airlines and airline customers of all sizes and shapes, either. The purpose of this post is to measure the buzz created by this situation across all social media sources, as well as to address the impact on sentiment towards both parties involved: Mr. Kevin Smith and Southwest Airlines.

I scoured the social web and found close to 45,000 relevant mentions of Kevin Smith and Southwest Airlines within the relevant time period, across blogs, microblogs, discussion boards / forums, and online news. On the trend graph below, you can clearly see that the event occurred on Valentine’s Day, February 14th, garnering 14,000 mentions that very day. The next day, even more discussion ensued, with 16,000 conversations taking place on the 15th. At this point, however, this topic has pretty much run its course, as interest waned after the 16th.

kevin smith swa trendline

Judging by the chart below, the incident was discussed in microblogs more  than in any other medium (66% of total conversations). This makes sense, because Twitter became the hub of all activity, as this is where Kevin Smith voiced his strong opinions against Southwest, quickly mobilizing his followers.

swa kevin smith coverage by source

The key issue that SWA and Kevin Smith should be concerned about in the aftermath of this proverbial storm, is the impact that the whole ordeal may leave on their respective brands. Yes, Kevin Smith is a personal brand, and, just like SWA, he should be concerned about what happens to it. Perhaps he is even monitoring social media with a monitoring and engagement solution? Hey, Kevin, we can help you with that! Southwest, we would be very happy to help you too!

So how does the public feel? Let’s take a look. For this type of discussion, I like to use sentiment trend graphs to understand how sentiment ebbed and flowed each day. For the purposes of this discussion, I did not analyze neutral sentiment, as it adds less value to the discussion. Looking at sentiment towards Kevin Smith (below), it becomes obvious that this incident has hurt his brand in the short term. Whereas negative was a bit above positive even prior to the incident, the gap between the two was never as large as it became during the 14th and 15th of this month. The day after the story broke on Twitter, negative sentiment soared high above positive, returning to a lower level, albeit still higher than positive, on the 16th and 17th.

kevin smith sentiment adj

Now let’s take a look at sentiment towards Southwest Air. During the days prior to the big event, SWA tended to have mostly positive sentiment. However, between the 14th and the 17th, positive and negative sentiment were both elevated and went pretty much neck in neck. Of note is that although fairly evenly split, negative sentiment never exceeded positive.

swa sentiment adjusted

Based on sentiment data presented above, I would say that both brands suffered in the process with increased negative sentiment; however Southwest Airlines has netted out ahead of Kevin Smith (in terms of sentiment) by garnering more positive support than Smith did. It’s important to realize that these are short term effects only; the real key would be to understand the long-term effect, if any, that the episode has had on public perception of both brands.  I am going to do a follow-up post on this, to track sentiment in a couple of weeks and maybe even further out.

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to our RSS feed. To find out how Biz360 can power your insights, visit us here, or get started here. Thanks for visiting!

Economic Crisis – PR Best Practices

Tuesday, May 26th, 2009

 

The current U.S. economic environment is certainly a trying time for most businesses but eventually this period will end giving rise to unique business opportunities for firms that are correctly positioned.  Biz360 was asked a novel business question by a top-tier firm in Silicon Valley to help them in formulating their “break-away” strategies.  Specifically:  are there any key learning experiences, including positive and negative ones, in managing a firm’s communications during an economic crisis?

 

Biz360 analysts looked at over 18,000 news stories related to the current economic crisis from a September 2008 through March 2009 timeframe for GM, Chrysler, Citigroup, AIG, Merrill Lynch and Sun Microsystems and how they managed the public’s perceptions of their brands.  Metrics included Coverage, MediaSignal, a measurement of audience reach based on the circulation / viewership of media coverage tempered by how prominently a brand was mentioned in the article, and Tone, a measurement of how  positive, neutral and negative a particular article was concerning a particular business.

 

GM and Chrysler were top newsmakers in coverage related to the economic crisis.  Primary coverage drivers for the automakers included 1) Lack of Planning 2) Layoffs 3) Viability 4) Earnings and 5) Financial Responsibility.

 

Financial firms Citigroup and Merrill Lynch and Insurance conglomerate AIG garnered next highest media visibility in stories that mentioned  1) Earnings Losses 2) Federal Bailout Burden on Taxpayers 3) Questionable Business Practices and 4) Planning for the Future and 5) Executive Compensation.

 

Summary of Key Media Issues

 

Auto Makers

  1. Planning for the future – basic business effectiveness
  2. Lay-offs – sticking it to the ‘little man’
  3. Viability
  4. Earnings
  5. Financial responsibility

 

Financial Firms

  1. Earnings
  2. Taxpayer burden
  3. Business practices
  4. Planning for the future
  5. Executive compensation

 

Overall

 

§         Auto makers were chastised more for basic business competency whereas Financial firms were pilloried more for moral / ethical issues

§         Neither outcome was pre-planned

§         Issues differ for different market verticals

 

PR Opportunities That Eluded GM – An Example

 

  • GM is an excellent example of “missed opportunities”
  • GM is now effectively characterized as a incompetent business, uncaring of its employees, a non-innovator, and which may no longer even be viable
  • Did you know:

         A Buick won the 2009 Best Car of the Year award (Money Magazine)

         The ZR 1 won the 2009 Automotive Excellence Aware for Performance (Popular Mechanics)

         Cadillac won the 2009 Best Resale Value Award (KBB)

 

Conclusions

 

  • Both the finance and automotive brands were not proactively aware of the issues, nor their details, confronting them
  • No effective response strategy was in place
  • No public awareness of steps being taken, or other positive factors, which could lessen the impact of the stories that grew to dominate their brands
  • The finance brands were among the most positively perceived global brands nine months ago and are now arguably the most vilified brands
  • The automotive brands have been suffering from a longer-term brand erosion – and we know many of the specific issues as to why that exists within today’s media – issues that could be addressed at least to some extent
  • In the time that a major brand becomes initially aware that something can, or will, be an issue and the time that everyone is fully aware that it has now become a major PR issue is small
  • GM and AIG are not necessarily managed by complete incompetents, yet these mission critical media issues escaped management’s early warning systems and now threaten these companies’ continued survival

What if it happens to you: The Domino’s social media crisis

Thursday, April 23rd, 2009

How will you know in time if your brand gets associated with the wrong voice in social media — in Domino’s case an unfortunate “disgusting” voice?  It is a challenge for marketers to be everywhere and monitor everything to protect their brands. In today’s era of immediate visibility this can be any marketer’s nightmare.

As part of the Domino’s crisis aftermath, I have read some recent posts and recommendations that marketers should periodically be searching for their brands. But in a case like Domino’s, timing is everything. Having to rely on random or periodic searches is not a reliable method for protecting your brand. Neither is Google alerts when your brand is mentioned regularly.

The good news is that savvy marketers can arm themselves so that they are prepared for these types of situations. This is a good time to take a close look at your current solution. While there is a confusing number of social media monitoring tools in the market right now, some will be better than others at preparing you for these situations. To be in the defensive seat, your solution should not rely on you to conduct manual periodic searches within the tool, nor to periodically log onto reports to constantly check your status. You need to be alerted as these situations occur:

• Does your solution provide a clear, proactive easy way to notify you when you have an unexpected change in volume or tone?
• Will your solution alert you if there are changes to high-risk topics you are tracking?
• Does your solution discover relevant new high risk topics that can appear unexpectedly?

A social media monitoring and measurement solution should help you to detect these situations early on, as well as manage them once you are in the thick of it. Biz360’s Community Insights solution was built to do precisely this.

Webcast Event: Managing in a Crisis with Biz360 Media Insights

Monday, February 23rd, 2009

February 26th at 11:00 am Pacific Time,  Registration Required
Managing in a Crisis

Please to join Biz360 Client Services team as they highlight Best Practices for Crisis Management – featuring a recent case study and leveraging Biz360 Media Insights account information

In this webcast you will learn how to:
• Proactively identify and manage threatening issues before they peak as a media crisis
• Identify which issues are driving a media crisis the most
• Improve your position when your industry or competitors are in a crisis

We’ll also review key questions to ask so you can get the maximum value from your Biz360 solution in a looming situation. As well as real case studies of companies in recent crisis, utilizing Media Insights information to understand the full impact and help determine the best actions to take.

REGISTER HERE

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes